Legal Opinion

Sanfillipo v. Rarden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1985No. C-840484PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

In this appeal, the question posed by the only assignment of error given to us for review is whether the trial judge properly invoked the provisions of Civ. R. 56 to deny relief to the plaintiffs-appellants, Joseph and Martha Jane Sanfillipo, in an action that sought damages for misrepresentations allegedly made in connection with the sale of an unimproved parcel of real estate. To resolve this question, we must assess the evidence in the record as it bears upon the several potentially…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berjian v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hibbett v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Teter v. Old Colony Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lepera v. FusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Swartzentruber v. Wee-K Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API