Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schuldies v. Millar

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1996No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceSabers, Justice

[¶ 48] The majority opinion errs by interpreting too narrowly SDCL 21-3-3, which provides in part:

SDCL 21-3-3. Presumed damages for wrongful conversion of personal property — Presumptions conclusive when possession wrongful from beginning. The detriment caused by the wrongful conversion of personal property is presumed to be:

[[Image here]](3) A fair compensation for the time and money properly expended in pursuit of the property!].]

[¶ 44] The majority opinion concludes that “SDCL 21-3-3 is insufficiently specific to allow attorney fees as damages in a conversion action.” In my view, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelynack v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Rollins v. LeiboldAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Fulks v. FulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. First National Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API