Schuldies v. Millar
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSabers, Justice
[¶ 48] The majority opinion errs by interpreting too narrowly SDCL 21-3-3, which provides in part:
SDCL 21-3-3. Presumed damages for wrongful conversion of personal property — Presumptions conclusive when possession wrongful from beginning. The detriment caused by the wrongful conversion of personal property is presumed to be:
[[Image here]](3) A fair compensation for the time and money properly expended in pursuit of the property!].]
[¶ 44] The majority opinion concludes that “SDCL 21-3-3 is insufficiently specific to allow attorney fees as damages in a conversion action.” In my view, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelynack v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rollins v. LeiboldAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Fulks v. FulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- First National Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.