Legal Opinion

Chupco v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1917No. 7570PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; Tom D. McKeown, Assigned Judge. Action by James C. Chupco and others against James A. Chapman and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

James C. Chupco, -Toney Chupco, Joseph Chupco, a minor, Tomy Chupco, Sarkaiye Chupco, Pollie Yargee, Moser Chupco, by Johnson E. Tiger, as his guardian, and Dick Larney and Eddie Lar-ney, minors, by John J. Troop, as their guardian, as plaintiffs, instituted this action in the district court of Hughes county, Okla., against James A. Chapman, H. B. Bonfoey, H. D. Seborn, Mada McAllister, Monitor Oil & Gas' Company, and George S. Hooker, as defendants, for the recovery of two certain tracts of land, being the allotments of Katie Chupco and Amos Chupco, respectively. A demurrer was sustained in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Shulthis v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Ellison v. Evergreen CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Jefferson v. Gypsy Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. King v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API