Legal Opinion

Gorelick v. Shapero

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1923No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Lamb (Fred S.), J., presiding. Bill by Louis Gorelick, trustee in bankruptcy of Louis Brodsky, against Bune Malke Shapero and others to reach certain lands transferred in fraud of creditors. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendant Louis Brodsky and his wife, Sadie Brodsky, made contracts for the erection of an apartment and business building on their lots in the city of Detroit, described as lots 21 and 22, Grosman and Cushing’s subdivision, and which are known in this record as “the Warren avenue property.” They arranged for á mortgage loan thereon of $46,650, but, under the terms of the loan, no money was to be advanced thereunder until the roof was on the building. It took considerable money to finance the building up to that point. Brodsky and wife had only $4,000. That was soon expended. They very soon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dickey v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Vinton v. BeamerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Meyer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Shaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1939
  3. Stiglitz v. WeinsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McDonald v. SennNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API