Legal Opinion

Stiglitz v. Weinstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1924No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The bill in this case was filed by Lillian Stiglitz and Bune Malke Shapero to foreclose the interest of Max Weinstein, Anna Weinstein, Louis Brodsky and Sadie Brodsky in the premises known in the record as the Warren avenue property and the Mack and Lemay property in default of the payment of the sums of $10,000 and interest alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiffs. The defendants Weinstein, appellants, claim fraud and usury. The trial court decreed foreclosure in the sum of $8,849.32. The case was first appealed by Mr. and Mrs. Weinstein, and later an appeal was taken by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vandervelde v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Malone v. DanforthMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gorelick v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McTavish v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Windisch v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hogan v. Hester Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Detroit Mortgage Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API