Legal Opinion

Shaw v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 16, 1939No. 2828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

The findings of fact herewith filed disclose the basis for the only issue of law involved herein. The contention of the government is that the lien of the United States for the taxes assessed attached to the interest of Harry E. Shaw as one of the tenants holding the property in an estate by the entireties and that it is entitled to have that interest sold under an order of the court.

While the rule in a number of states is to the contrary, the Supreme Court of Michigan has consistently -aligned itself with what appears to be the majority rule to the effect that no…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Dickey v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  5. Vinton v. BeamerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haldeman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
  2. Duplin County v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API