Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Converse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1898PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error to Hillsdale; Lane, J. Trover by Edgar P. Dickey and Mary A. Dickey against Russell E. Converse. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In October, 1885, the plaintiff Edgar P. Dickey gave bis note for Bohemian oats for $160. In *450September, 1889, Mrs. Salmon recovered in tbe circuit court a judgment upon this note. Afterwards an execution was issued, and placed in the hands of the sheriff, who is defendant in this case. In September, 1894, he levied upon crops grown upon an 80-acre farm, occupied by the plaintiffs in this case. He afterwards sold the crops, and the plaintiffs sued him in trover for the conversion. The case was tried by the circuit judge, who gave judgment in favor of plaintiffs. He also made findings of fact…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Jacobs v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Smith v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Town of BinghamUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Sanford v. BertrauMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sawada v. EndoHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Morrill v. MorrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API