Legal Opinion

Vinton v. Beamer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1885PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Livingston. (Newton, J.) Ejectment. Defendant William brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover the interest of William Beamer in about one hundred and sixty acres of land, which is claimed by plaintiff to be the use of an equal undivided one-half part thereof for and during the natural life of said Beamer. Maria Beamer, wife of William, previous to the 24th day of March, 1876, owned the entire property in question, and on that day sold and deeded to her son Sobieski, taking from him, as the consideration therefor, a life-estate therein for herself and husband, and the survivor of either of them. There were two houses upon the farm. One was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Lozo v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ætna Insurance v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sanford v. BertrauMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Dickey v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API