Legal Opinion

San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1930No. Docket Nos. Sac. 4245, 4246, 4247, 4248, 4249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The first four of the above-entitled actions were consolidated by agreement for the purpose of trial. The fifth of said actions was by stipulation submitted to the trial court on the record established at the trial of the consolidated actions. While a separate transcript in each action has been prepared and filed in this court under the alternative method, the briefs and arguments of counsel have been addressed to the actions as a group.

These actions were instituted to recover taxes levied upon certain gross receipts of the plaintiff: during the years 1921 to 1925, inclusive, and paid under…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spillers v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. People ex rel. Pearsall v. Catholic BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis v. Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Story v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Horton v. Colorado Springs Masonic Building SocietySupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fellowship of Humanity v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Smith v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. District of Columbia v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API