Story v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Prank L. Guerena, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant in Sac. No. 3061 and for Respondent in Sac. No. 3062. Amend & Amend for Respondent in Sac. No. 3061 and for Appellant in Sac. No. 3062.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of having an assessment declared null and void and to recover from the treasurer of the state of California the amount of a tax paid by plaintiff pursuant to said assessment and under protest.
The plaintiff, Walter P. Story, is the owner of a twelve-story office building in the city of Los Angeles, in the subbasement of which are located three 125 horse-power boilers, pumping engines, lighting engines, vacuum-sweeper engines, a hot-water heater, filtering machinery, house-pumps, etc. This machinery and' equipment were placed in the building at the time…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Porten v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.