Legal Opinion

Smith v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1941No. Nos. 28249, 28250PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Two actions were brought in the superior court to determine whether certain personal property owned and held by defendant railroad company should be assessed as “operating property” or as “non-operating property,” as those two descriptive terms are defined by chapter 123, Laws of 1935, p. 356 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 11156-1 [P. C. § 7088-31] etseq.), which provides a method for the assessment and taxation of property of transportation and other utility companies. One of the actions was brought by the assessor of Pierce county against the Northern Pacific Railway Company and the members of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Goodwin v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Washington Federation of State Employees v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Pirak v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API