Legal Opinion
Rosa v. Cristina
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1949PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The lessors of premises located in Waterbury brought an action of summary process against the lessee. The City Court of Waterbury entered judgment for the lessors, and this writ of error was taken by the lessee.
The basic claim of the lessee is that the complaint failed to allege a cause of action of summary process. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 1429e (Rev. 1949, § 8274), provides that it lies only where a lease “shall terminate by lapse of time, or by reason of any expressed stipulation therein,” or under the statute as to nonpayment of rent, § 897h of the 1945 Cumulative Supplement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Davidson v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Bowman v. FootSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Kovner v. DubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Southland Corp. v. VernonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Sandrew v. Pequot Drug, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- S.H.V.C., Inc. v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.