State v. Dahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Darin Dahl appealed from criminal judgments filed in December 2008, sentencing him for two counts of harassment and one count of reckless endangerment. Dahl argues the evidence presented was insufficient to support the guilty verdicts and he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel for his second trial. Competent evidence was presented allowing the juries to draw inferences reasonably tending to prove Dahl’s guilt and fairly warranting conviction; Dahl was competent to waive his right to counsel and represent himself; and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. White BirdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BuckleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.