Legal Opinion

Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 2003No. 00-1471PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Kentucky law provides that “[a] health insurer shall not discriminate against any provider who is located within the geographic coverage area of the health benefit plan and who is willing to meet the terms and conditions for participation established by the health insurer, including the Kentucky state Medicaid program and Medicaid partnerships.” Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §304.17A-270 (West 2001). Moreover, any “health benefit plan that includes chiropractic benefits shall ... [p]ermit any licensed chiropractor who agrees to abide by the terms, conditions, reimbursement rates, and standards of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Ellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co. v. Cigna HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API