Legal Opinion
Winter Hill Frozen Foods & Services, Inc. v. Haagen-Dazs Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 25, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-0009-XXPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
Winter Hill Frozen Foods and Services, Inc. (“Winter Hill”), a frozen food distributor, brought this action against The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. (“Haagen-Dazs”), an ice cream manufacturer, The Pillsbury Co., Inc. (“Pillsbury”), the corporate parent of Haagen-Dazs, and the New England distributors of Haagen-Dazs products, 1 alleging that the defendants’ refusal to sell Haagen-Dazs products to Winter Hill is an unlawful restraint of competition in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. sec. 1, and various state laws. This matter is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Evans v. Certified Engineering & Testing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Rand v. M/A-COM, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.