Legal Opinion
Rand v. M/A-COM, INC.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 18, 1992No. Civ. A. 86-1347-NPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order Re: Motions for Summary Judgment and to Strike.
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court are five motions for summary judgment (Docket Entry ##476, 485, 487, 496 & 507) and three motions to strike the parties’ respective statements filed under LR. 56.1 and to strike a supporting affidavit submitted in support of the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # # 511, 528 & 539). This putative class action, brought by various purchasers of stock of defendant M/A-Com, Inc. (“M/A-Com”), is referred to this court for trial pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schaffer v. Timberland Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Golden Rule Insurance v. AtallahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Askar v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Berke, et al. v. Presstek, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Okocha v. Brigham & WomanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.