Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Schotten

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 1993-2308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 466.] CORNELL, APPELLANT, v. SCHOTTEN, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Cornell v. Schotten,

1994-Ohio-74.] Writ of habeas corpus seeking relief from confinement—Petition dismissed for failure to attach copies of commitment papers or cause of detention as required by R.C. 2725.04(D)—Habeas corpus not a substitute for appeal or post-conviction relief. (No. 93-2308—Submitted March 29, 1994—Decided June 22, 1994.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Trumbull County, No. 93-T-940. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, James E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bloss v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cornell v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In re PiazzaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bellman v. JagoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Parker v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Allah-U-Akbar v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Ghaster v. Fitzsimmons, 90652 (11-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API