Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Schotten

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 93-2308PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant first contends that his duty to submit commitment papers was negated when respondent, J.L. Schotten, Warden of the Trumbull Correctional Institution, supplied a copy of the commitment order with a motion to dismiss the complaint. Appellant further contends that his memorandum in *467opposition to the motion to dismiss cured his failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). However, R.C. 2725.04(D) explicitly requires that a copy of the cause of detention be attached to a petition for habeas corpus. We held in Bloss v. Rogers (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 145, 602 N.E.2d 602, that failure to attach a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bloss v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re PiazzaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bellman v. JagoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Parker v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Boyd v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Daniel v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Day v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Thomas v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Boyd v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API