Legal Opinion

Bloss v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. 92-215PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant claims it is unconstitutional to revoke a mentally ill person’s parole for violations caused by his mental illness. The court of appeals reached the correct conclusion when it dismissed appellant’s complaint *146for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). These commitment papers are necessary for a complete understanding of the petition. Without them, the petition is fatally defective. When a petition is presented to a court that does not comply with R.C. 2725.04(D), there is no showing of how the commitment was procured and there is nothing before the court on which to make a…

2Cited by117 opinions

  1. Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Boyd v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brown v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McBroom v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cornell v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API