Legal Opinion

Ghaster v. Fitzsimmons, 90652 (11-19-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2007No. 90652Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Pamela Ghaster has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Ghaster argues that the provision of a "protection order to protect a victim of menacing by stalking," as issued by Judge Donna Congeni Fitzsimmons in the Rocky River Municipal Court, is excessive with regard to the requirement that she stay 1500' from the protected person at all times. For the following reasons, we sua sponte dismiss Ghaster's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} Initially, we find that Ghaster has failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a), which mandates that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bloss v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Peeples v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Wilcox v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API