Legal Opinion

Bellman v. Jago

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1988No. 88-44PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant raises the following constitutional issues: right to counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, right to a speedy trial, denial of due process, and effective assistance of counsel. All these issues are appropriately raised by appeal or through post-conviction relief proceedings under R.C. 2953.21 through 2953.23, but not *56by petition for habeas corpus. Habeas corpus “is not and never was a post-conviction remedy for the review of errors or irregularities of an accused’s conviction or for a retrial of the guilt or innocence of an accused. * * *” Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 136,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cornell v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Daniel v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bevins v. RichardOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API