Bellman v. Jago
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant raises the following constitutional issues: right to counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, right to a speedy trial, denial of due process, and effective assistance of counsel. All these issues are appropriately raised by appeal or through post-conviction relief proceedings under R.C. 2953.21 through 2953.23, but not *56by petition for habeas corpus. Habeas corpus “is not and never was a post-conviction remedy for the review of errors or irregularities of an accused’s conviction or for a retrial of the guilt or innocence of an accused. * * *” Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 136,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cornell v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Daniel v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- In re ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bevins v. RichardOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- In re ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.