Legal Opinion
Empire Star Mines Co. v. Butler
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1944No. Civ. 12409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff and defendant Cooley Butler each operate gold mines in the Grass Valley mining district of Nevada County. Plaintiff instituted this action against Cooley Butler, Wallace Butler and Fred Kalenborn for injunctive relief and damages. The last two named persons were joined as defendants as employees of Cooley Butler. The action was dismissed as to Fred Kalenborn. The theory of the complaint was that defendants had drilled holes from their mine through which water was artificially and wrongfully introduced into that portion of the workings of plaintiff’s mine which is located below the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Commercial Cable Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Walling v. Haile Gold Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Berry v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Friends of the Trails v. BlasiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Marin Municipal Water District v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Patten v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.