Legal Opinion

In Re Silva

California Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring the infant daughter of the appellants to be an abandoned child. There is also a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript of the evidence is incomplete. The appeal was regularly taken, and we have before us a clerk’s transcript and what purports to be a reporter’s transcript. The motion must, therefore, be denied, and the appeal considered on the merits. (Way mire v. California Trona Co., 176 Cal. 395, 398 [168 Pac. 563].)

The proceeding is one prosecuted under subdivision 1 of section 15 of the Juvenile Court Law (Stats. 1915,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Coleman v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Owen v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Bell v. BriganceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Barlow v. CromeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Windas v. Galston & Sutton Theatres Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API