Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1972No. 42161PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This appeal by defendant William B. Korstad arises out of a derivative shareholders’ action brought by Walter and Theodore Anderson on behalf of Lakeland Development Corporation (Lakeland) to rescind a sale of land owned by Lakeland to defendant Lecon Properties, Inc., (Lecon) and to recover from defendant Korstad, an officer and director of, and legal counsel for, both corporations, $17,500 in fees paid to him by Lakeland for effecting the sale. Prior to trial, Lakeland, by cross-complaint against defendant Korstad, also sought recovery of the fees paid. This claim was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Bakke v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Olson v. PettiboneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Janice S. Hope v. Mirek KlabalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. James W. Parkhill, an Individual, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API