Legal Opinion

State v. Thompkin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2006No. CC 0105-33237; CA A116637; SC S51405PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*371RIGGS, J.

In this criminal case, we decide whether police officers unlawfully “seized” an automobile passenger under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1

During a lawful traffic stop of the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger, the officers requested and retained defendant’s identification to conduct a records check. At the time, the officers did not have either a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity on defendant’s part or a concern about an immediate threat to officer safety. While one officer ran the records check, a second officer questioned defendant about drugs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. AylesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. VondehnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API