State v. Thompkin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*371RIGGS, J.
In this criminal case, we decide whether police officers unlawfully “seized” an automobile passenger under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1
During a lawful traffic stop of the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger, the officers requested and retained defendant’s identification to conduct a records check. At the time, the officers did not have either a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity on defendant’s part or a concern about an immediate threat to officer safety. While one officer ran the records check, a second officer questioned defendant about drugs.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. AylesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. VondehnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.