Legal Opinion
State v. Vondehn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 30, 2008No. C040956CR; A128800PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions, after a stipulated facts trial, for one count each of delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance under former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence that the police obtained through a consent search while he was under arrest on an unrelated matter and its refusal to suppress statements that he made after the search and after receiving Miranda warnings. We reverse and remand.
The facts are generally -undisputed. We state them in accordance with…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MorriseyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. SCHWERBELCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.