United States v. Minnesota
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
This case poses a problem endemic to our federal system of government: the apparent conflict between a broad system of federal regulation and a detailed state regulatory scheme. The tension is exacerbated in this case, however, because the apparent conflict bears directly on men and women who serve the people of the United States — officers of the Public Health Service. After carefully examining the arguments made by the parties, the Court is convinced that the State of Minnesota cannot, as a matter of law, presume Public Health…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Planned Parenthood Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018