Legal Opinion
Nitz v. Nitz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1990No. C8-89-2204PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing appellant Karen Nitz’s claims against respondent David Nitz on res judicata grounds. Respondent has filed a notice of review, challenging dismissal of his third-party claims against respondent David Nitz, Inc. (“Corporation”). We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case involve three lawsuits: Nitz I, Nitz II, and Nitz III. This appeal involves dismissal of claims raised in Nitz II.
In May 1980, appellant and respondent, who is her husband and the president of the Corporation, moved into a new home built by the Corporation. Appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Steve D. Thompson Trucking, Inc. v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc. And Dyro-Tech Industries, Inc. D/B/A "Cor Tec"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Anderson v. Werner Continental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Radmacher v. CardinalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Penn v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Henry S. Reinke D/B/A Lakeside Properties v. Robert W. Boden, Richard M. Stark, and John C. KalenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Austin v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Hill v. AMMC, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Paulos v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.