Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1936No. 27056PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This is an original action by the Pure Oil Company, as petitioner, against the Oklahoma Tax Commission, as respondent, seeking a writ of prohibition to prohibit the Oklahoma Tax Commission from collecting motor vehicle taxes from petitioner upon certain motor trucks owned and operated by it upon the highways of the state, which trucks are being designated by respondent as class “C” motor carriers under the provisions of article 12, chap. 2Ü, p. 27, Session Laws of 1935.

The facts are the same as in Pure Oil Co. v. Cornish, 174 Okla. 615, 52 P. (2d) 832. However, that case involved the question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Dabney v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. State Corporation Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Ex Parte SalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Leveridge v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. NAIFEH v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API