Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Tindall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 9, 1924No. 14674PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This is an application of A. L. Tindall for writ of habeas corpus and involves the constitutionality of chapter li3> Sess. Laws 1923, page 188, known as the “Motor Vehicle Act.”
Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully distrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Osage county upon a warrant issued out of the county court of said county and based upon a prosecution pending in said county wherein petitioner is charged with violation of said act.
Petitioner does not deny that he has vio-\ lated said statute, but bases his right to a I discharge upon the ground that said act is I unconstitutional…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Ochoa v. Hernandez Y MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by68 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. CapshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.