Legal Opinion
Dabney v. Hooker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1926No. 17766PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
At the primary election held August 3, 1926, Edwin Dabney and O. H. Searcy and others were candidates for the nomination of the Democratic party for the office of Attorney General. The State Election Board, upon a canvass of the returns, issued its certificate of nomination to Dabney. Thereupon Searcy instituted a civil action in the district court of- Oklahoma county to try the title to such nomination. Dabney objected to the district court of Oklahoma county taking jurisdiction of said contest, on the ground that a contest of the result of a primary election is not a. legal right in the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Harris v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Pentagon Academy, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Owens v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.