Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Sales
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 9, 1924No. 15509PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This case is here upon the petition of Ray Sales for writ of habeas corpus to test the validity of chapter 113; Sess. Lawá 1923, page 188.
The facts herein are identical with those in cause No. 14674, In re Application of Tindall for writ of habeas corpus, this day decided, 102 Okla. 192, 229 Pac. 125.
In this case as in the Tindall Case, supra, the petitioner makes no denial of having violated the statutes, and like Tindall, has not sought to avail himself of the privileges granted by .the statute, but has assumed to conduct a business in open defiance of the statute. Each has assailed the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by22 opinions
- Calvey v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- NAIFEH v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Stith Petroleum Co. v. Department of Audit & ControlIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. State Corporation Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.