Riden v. Kemet Electronics Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
Earl Lee Riden and his wife, Faye Riden, brought this negligence action against Kemet Electronics Corporation and Insulation Services seeking damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium resulting from an explosion that occurred at Kemet’s plant. Kemet moved for summary judgment, claiming Riden was its statutory employee as a matter of law and therefore Riden’s exclusive remedy was a claim for workers’ compensation benefits under 'S.C. Code Ann. § 42-1-540 (1985). 1 The trial court denied Kemet’s summary judgment motion. 2 Kemet appeals. We reverse and remand.
Upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jolly v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Bargesser v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Benbow v. EDMUNDS HIGH SCHOOLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Boone v. Huntington & Guerry Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Voss v. Ramco, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.