Legal Opinion

Bargesser v. Coleman Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1957No. 17264PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This action is one by W. M. Bargesser, the respondent herein, against Fred Ducker, trading as Ducker Refrigeration Company, a dealer in heating equipment, and The Coleman Company, the manufacturer of such heating equipment. The Summons was served upon Fred Ducker only. The respondent asserts that Fred Ducker was the franchise agent of The Coleman Company and that he is engaged in the business of selling and installing furnaces and heating units manufactured by the appellant, The Coleman Company, and that such appellant warranted its product through said franchise agent.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bass v. American Products Export & I. Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State of South Carolina v. W.T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Singletary v. Humphrey-Coker Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Industrial Equipment Co. v. Frank G. Hough Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Douglas v. Frigidaire Sales Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Carrier v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  3. Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Lake v. Reeder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API