Legal Opinion
Hernandez-Zuniga v. Tickle
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 14, 2007No. 4253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
The Appellate Panel of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission (“SCWCC”) found Andrew Tickle (“Tickle”) did not regularly employ four or more employees. Accordingly, the Appellate Panel did not have jurisdiction to award benefits to Hernandez-Zuniga (“Claimant”). The circuit court affirmed the Decision and Order of the Appellate Panel. We affirm. 1
FACTUAL!PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Claimant sustained his injury on May 10, 2003 when he fell from a ladder while painting for his employer, Tickle. He sought temporary disability benefits and medical treatment under the South…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Fredrick v. WELLMAN, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Turner v. SAIIA ConstructionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.