Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Webb
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1979.]
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.
We are reporting two cases in this opinion because of a common question of law decided diametrically at the trial level in different circuits. In each instance, however, an insurer is the appellant and the appellees are individuals who have recovered from their insurers under policies containing an uninsured motorist provision as required by Md. Code, Art. 48A, § 541 (c), which provides that
“... every policy of motor vehicle liability insurance issued ... shall contain coverage ... for damages which the insured is entitled to recover from the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Pat Perusse Realty Co. v. LingoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- James v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Rogers v. NathanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Harnicar v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv 93 0063893 (Jun. 7, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Infinity/U.S.A., Inc. v. Sprocor, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987