Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Nathan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 10, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-2218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the motion of Defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
The Plaintiff, Tawanna M. Rogers, filed her complaint against Defendants Derrick Tyrone Nathan (Nathan) and Allstate alleging negligence and breach of contract arising out of an automobile accident which occurred within the District of Columbia. In Count I the Plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Essie H. Jewell v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Allstate Insurance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Robison v. CastelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chavez v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- McIntosh v. GilleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Chavez v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Rgi Events & Public Relations, LLC v. Al Qurm Management ConsultancyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019