Legal Opinion
Rinehart v. Akers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 15, 2013No. Docket No. 11-4232-cvPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) are former employees of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”), or its subsidiaries, who participated in the Lehman Brothers Savings Plan (the “Plan”) and, specifically, in the Lehman Stock Fund (the *141“LSF”). The Plan is covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Under the Plan, employees of Lehman could choose to contribute portions of their salaries to different investment funds to save for retirement. One of the funds, the LSF, is an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) invested…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Kuper v. IovenkoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fifth Third Bancorp v. DudenhoefferSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- In re Lehman Bros. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. One or More Unknown Traders in Securities of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.