Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Valk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1913No. 10844PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered August 21, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee engaged in tearing down a building.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. In November, 1910, the defendant Valk entered into a contract with defendant Spokane School District No. 81, for tearing down and removing the ruins of a brick high school building which had been partially destroyed by fire. For the prosecution of the work, about seventy-five men were employed by the defendant, under the superintendence of a foreman. Among these, the plaintiff, a common laborer, began work on the 12th day of November. The fire had destroyed a large part of the floors, but had left of the third floor in the southeast corner of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Offutt v. World's Columbian ExpositionIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gundlach v. SchottIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Liedke v. Moran Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Etheridge v. Gordon Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jobe v. Spokane Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hull v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Williams v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lamoon v. Smith Cement Brick Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Monte Vista Canal Co. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API