Legal Opinion

Liedke v. Moran Bros.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1906No. 6131PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered October 16, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in. favor of the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained by an employee through the fall of a scaffold.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. In brief, the plaintiff sets forth in his complaint, that on the 18th day of March, 1905, he was in the employ of the defendant corporation; that he was ordered and directed by a representative of the defendant company to mount a scaffold; that while he was at work on this scaffold it fell on account of its faulty construction; and that in consequence of this fall he sustained the physical injuries for which he seeks damages. The answer admitted that, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant and that he fell from a scaffold. All the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steeples v. Panel & Folding Box Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Terrell v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Terrell v. . WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Barkley v. South Atlantic Waste Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Dumas v. Walville Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API