Legal Opinion
Lyle v. Koubourlis
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1989No. 16167, 16308PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
I. AKERS v. KOUBOURLIS
Appellants, Demetrius J. Koubourlis and Toni J. Koubourlis (Koubourlis), appeal the district court’s holding that an enforceable settlement agreement existed between Robert William Akers (Akers) and Koub-ourlis and that no actionable fraud existed in the contract between Richard W. Lyle (Lyle) and the Koubourlises.
During the months of January and February of 1983, Koubourlis entered into negotiations with Akers over the purchase of a property known as Moscow Mall. Also in February of 1983, Koubourlis discussed the possible purchase of the Akers…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Southern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. AstorquiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Roemer v. Green Pastures Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McColm-Traska v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Ogden v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Lawrence v. HutchinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Suitts v. First SEC. Bank of Idaho, NAIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Harvey v. F-B Truck Line Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.