Legal Opinion

In Re Luxottica Group S.P.A., Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 26, 2003No. 01 CV 3285 NG MDGPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

This securities class action was brought by individuals who sold their shares of Sunglass Hut, Inc. (“Sunglass Hut”) to Shade Acquisition Group (“Shade Acquisition”), pursuant to a tender offer made in March of 2001 as part of a two-step merger between Sunglass Hut and Luxottiea Group S.p.A. (“Luxottiea”). Plaintiffs bring claims against Luxottiea; Luxottica’s controlling shareholder, Leonardo Del Vecchio (“Del Vecchio”); Shade Acquisition, a wholly owned subsidiary of Luxotti-ca; James N. Hauslein, Sunglass Hut’s Chairman of the Board; and Rohit…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Norstan Apparel Shops, Inc. v. Lattman (In Re Norstan Apparel Shops, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. Rahl v. BandeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Apace Communications, Ltd. v. BurkeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API