Legal Opinion
National Advertising Co v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico State Highway Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1977No. 11147PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE E. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Our Memorandum Opinion filed July 11, 1977 in this case is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
The Plaintiffs-Appellants, (herein Sign Owners) brought this suit in the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District seeking a declaratory judgment that Sign Owners should be compensated for the value of their signs removed pursuant to the State Highway Beautification Act, § 55-11-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp. 1975) or, alternatively, that if Sign Owners’ signs were pot compensable under the Act, then the Highway Beautification Act…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Silver City Consolidated School District No. 1 v. Board of Regents of New Mexico Western CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Stuckey's Stores, Inc. v. O'CheskeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Lopez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Weir v. RimmelinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Gonzales v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.