Gonzales v. Public Employees Retirement Board
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
In this case we are asked to decide what retirement benefits fifty-two former long-term state employees are entitled to receive after having resigned from their state jobs in order to work for local government employers for a short time before retirement. More generally, we are asked to choose between differing versions of the facts and equities of this case.
According to the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB), plaintiffs claim entitlement to a “free lunch,” whereby they, through a nonexistent legislative loophole, seek to get what no other state employees are…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Perea v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Stuckey's Stores, Inc. v. O'CheskeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Strong v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Alvarez v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Barnae v. BarnaeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.