Legal Opinion

Rainaldi v. Public Employees Retirement Board

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1993No. 20138PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Chief Justice.

Magistrate Lidio Rainaldi claims entitlement to retirement benefits, prospectively and retroactively from January 1, 1987, under the Public Employees Retirement Act in effect at the time this lawsuit was initiated, NMSA 1978, Sections 10-11-1 to - 41 (Repl.Pamp.1983 & Cum.Supp.1986). 1 On April 30, 1987, the Public Employment Retirement Board, a state agency created in the Act and assigned the tasks of effecting the provisions of the Act and of managing the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA), granted retirement benefits to Judge Rainaldi; but on May…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. National Council on Compensation Insurance v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Austin v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Lovato v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Smith v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hanson v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API