Legal Opinion
Zuleski v. Pipella
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1976No. 46372PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion to reinstate their cause of action on the general term calendar and granting defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 37.04 and Rule 41.02(1), Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm.
The action was commenced in February 1972. Plaintiffs filed a note of issue on August 11, 1972. On February 28, 1973, they were notified that if the case was not certified ready for trial within 10 days, it would be striken from the general term calendar. No certification having been filed, it was striken on April 2, 1973. r
In November…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Firoved v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Electro Nuclear Systems Corp. v. Telex Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reichert v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Belton v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Copeland v. BraggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Berks v. FineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Dvoracek v. LovelyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.