Legal Opinion
Dvoracek v. Lovely
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1985No. C3-84-1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant commenced this action in April, 1976. About six years ago, her current counsel became involved in the case. Appellant took no action in the suit from June 1976, until a note of issue was filed in April 1984. The trial court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. We affirm.
FACTS
In April 1976, appellant Cleo M. Dvora-cek commenced this action against respondents Consolidated Brokerage, Inc., and Richard E. Lovely, a salesperson with Consolidated Brokerage, as well as four insurance companies, Continental Bankers Life Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- DeMars v. Robinson King Floors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Scherer v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Zuleski v. PipellaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul v. KotlarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Belton v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ryan v. Ballentine VFW Post No. 246Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Dorenkemper v. City of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Mill Pond Towers, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987