Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Bragge
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1985No. C8-85-1285PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Channie and Raymond Copeland appeal from a judgment entered against them pursuant to an order for dismissal with prejudice. The trial court dismissed the action based on respondent Gerald Bragge’s motion to dismiss under Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure 41.02(1) for failure to prosecute. We affirm.
FACTS
This is a negligence action for personal injuries sustained in a two car accident which occurred on February 8, 1976. Channie Copeland was driving her car in which her three minor children, Wanda, Raymond, Jr. and Cathy, ages 16, 14 and 10, were passengers. Gerald Bragge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firoved v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- DeMars v. Robinson King Floors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Scherer v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Belton v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Kurak v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Nelson v. SiebertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Ed H. Anderson Co. v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.