Legal Opinion

Berks v. Fine

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1987No. C9-87-375PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

David Berks appeals the dismissal of his action with prejudice, and the denial of his motion to vacate the dismissal. We reverse.

FACTS

David Berks sued Gerald Fine for alleged legal malpractice occurring in 1976. The pleadings were filed in September of 1982. Interrogatories were later served by Fine. In March 1985, Berks’ attorney withdrew and Berks continued pro se.

Berks’ deposition was taken by Fine in May of 1986 and in October of 1986, Fine moved for summary judgment. In April 1986 the court continued the summary judgment motion to June 28,1986, at which time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zuleski v. PipellaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bentonize, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Hellerstedt v. MacGibbonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API