Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Lothman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1958No. 6270PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'LUJAN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Clinton W. Pederson, filed this action in the District Court of McKinley County, asking for specific performance of an alleged oral contract by which the defendants-appellees, Louis B. Lothman and Mid-Continent Exploration Company, had allegedly promised him a five percent interest in certain mineral claims and leases in return for his services in the location of mineral claims and for-acting as the “representative” for appellee Mid-Continent Exploration Company in the State of New Mexico. He asked in the alternative for damages in the amount of five…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Agnew v. LibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Moritz v. LavelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
  5. Murley v. EnnisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rekart v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Sanders v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. General Electric Credit Corporation v. TidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API